It is irrefutable that formula fed infants have a substantially increased risk of childhood obesity as compared to breastfed infants, and these children carry an increased risk of obesity in adulthood.
There has been discussion for many years about the use of corn syrup solids (CSS) as the main absorbable carbohydrate in infant formula because it has a higher glycemic index than lactose. CSS are not the same as high fructose corn syrup.
The glycemic index (GI) of a food is a measure of how high the blood sugar will rise after consumption. Foods are given a score of 1-100, and the higher the score, the higher and faster the rise of blood sugar. For example, the GI of an apple is 36 +/-2, the GI of grapes is 53, while the GI of black beans is 30. Foods with a higher GI cause a rapid increase in blood sugar, triggering release of insulin, followed by a drop in blood sugar (sugar crash), resulting in hunger and the risk of overeating. Because lower GI foods lead to a slower release of sugar into the blood stream, insulin remains lower, with less chance of overeating.
Because CSS have a GI of 100, compared to 46 for lactose (the natural sugar in breastmilk), there is concern that CSS formula vs formula with lactose further increases the risk of childhood obesity beyond what we see as a baseline risk for formula fed infants.
The authors of the study for this week followed weights of children who received CSS formula vs other types of formula thru the US Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). The data was collected from a large WIC agency in Southern California from September 2012 to March 2016 and included infants who stopped breastfeeding by 3 months and received formula for the rest of their first year. Data on BMIs between ages 24 and 60 months were evaluated based on formula type.
Most children in the study (87.5%) were Hispanic, 79.6% had an income below 100% of the federal poverty level, and the children were breastfed for 1 month on average. The children who received formula with CSS had a lower weight-for-age and weight-for-length measurements at baseline, at 3-5 months of age.
What was the impact of CSS formula on the risk of obesity? See the question!
Beth
This is fascinating!! So many of my patients ask about formulas from Europe and I’ve wondered how to counsel them. Of course those with WIC don’t have thie option . Are the U.S. formulas that don’t contain CSS inferior in other ways to European formulas? DHA content or source? Thank you for this!
Tara Williams
Important study. Hopefully the recent formula crisis and studies like these will help shed some light into the dark world of unethical formula marketing.
Amy Kaplan
Really interesting article! The thing that’s so tricky though is that the formulas that have the reduced lactose also are also the ones that have partially hydrolyzed proteins, which can be beneficial with cow’s milk protein intolerance. It seems like it’s such a trade off!